The History of Economic Downturns in the US
Climate Change Timeline | History of Economic Downturns | 8th Grade Final Exam
The US has suffered a great many economic downturns in history. Here is a listing of most of the significant ones:
Depressions
During the era where commodities played a key role in controlling US currency, there tended to be economic depressions, different from recessions because they lasted longer, involved price collapses and bank failures, and were much more severe.
- 1797
- 3 Years
- Caused by gold-based deflation in Britain hitting US economy
- Price failures
The Bank of England was unable to maintain specie payments during that country’s war with France. This produced a cascade effect of currency shortages that easily crossed to the trade-based economy of the United States, where it caused massive inability to pay debt and lack of capital investment.
_____________________________________________________________ - 1819
- Two Years
- Caused by contraction of money by the Second Bank of the US
- Credit crisis
- Deflation
- Cotton and other price failures
In 1819, the Second Bank of the United States forced a reduction in money supply, creating a credit crisis, forcing downward pricing pressures resulted in a collapse of banks, cotton prices, and prices in general.
- 1832
- Two years
- Caused by contraction of money when the National Bank was shut down by “Hard Money” advocate Andrew Jackson
- Credit crisis
- Price failures
- Massive unemployment
- Bank failures
In 1832, another contraction of credit and money causes a series of bank failures. Part of the lack of money supply was caused by Andrew Jackson shutting down the Second Bank of the United States…akin to shutting down the Fed. http://history1800s.about.com/od/thegildedage/a/financialpanics.htm http://www.thehistorybox.com/ny_city/panics/panics_article3a.htm _____________________________________________________________
- 1836
- Six years
- Caused by a return to gold-backed currency creating a money shortage
- Credit failure
- Record unemployment dwarfing 1832
- Bank failures
- Cotton price collapse
- money supply down 58%
In 1836, just a few years later, Jackson’s effort to force the use of “hard money” (gold and silver) produced ANOTHER contraction, causing real estate prices to plummet, as well as prices in general. Remember, suddenly declining prices are as harmful to the economy as rising prices. You don’t get something for nothing. Banks in the 1830s retained a stable ratio of gold to currency…this meant that when the economy grew, the ratio of money to the economy’s wealth plunged, creating negative price tensions that always result in economic failure. Within a year, 1837, yet another price contraction occurred, including cotton price failures, bank failures, an explosion of unemployment (normal with globally falling prices), continued real estate price instability…this gold-caused depression lasted six years, the second longest in US history. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1837 http://www.thehistorybox.com/ny_city/panics/panics_article6a.htm _____________________________________________________________
- 1857
- Two years
- Metallic currency causes a cyclical price collapse
- Stock prices collapse
- 900 mercantile firms, in New York alone, fail
- Agricultural prices fail, triggered by a decline of demand form Europe
- Real estate prices collapse
- Significant unemployment increase
- money supply down 23%
In 1857, another cyclical wave of price/money collapse, as is inevitable under a commodity-based currency. Stock prices plunge, banks fail, prices fall…prices fall in almost every gold-based economic depression, because the economy grows but the currency cannot, creating a shortage that forces prices back down, causing rampant unemployment, bank failures, bubble-bursts of whole industries, et cetera. This lasts two years. Oh, by the way, the 1819 collapse lasted two years, too. That’s pretty much the minimum for an economic depression, whereas that would be abnormally long, for a modern recession. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_central_banking_in_the_United_States#1837-1862:_Free_Banking_Era http://www.thehistorybox.com/ny_city/panics/panics_article7a.htm _____________________________________________________________
- 1869
- Two years
- Gold directly causes an economic failure
- Gold prices collapse
- Stocks fail
- Rail companies collapse, paralyzing the economy
Another depression. Gold was DIRECTLY at fault for this one: Gold goes through a speculative bubble, suddenly collapsing in price, much like in 1981. This is the famous Black Friday. Gold speculators like the gold bugs you guys have to beware heeding attempted to drive the price up even higher (as they’re trying now), causing the price to spike, then collapse. As in 1981, and as will soon happen again, everyone attempting to invest in gold is pretty much bankrupted. This failure lasted two years. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Friday_(1869) http://www.thehistorybox.com/ny_city/panics/panics_article8a.htm _____________________________________________________________ - 1873
- Either 5 years, or is the start of a 23 year span of economic weakness known as the Long Depression
- Caused, in large part, by a switch to the Gold Standard producing a prolonged money shortage
- Credit collapse
- Banks fail
- Insufficient money even to do normal business/trade, therefore
- 18,000 businesses fail
After only two years of economic recovery, DEFLATION itself directly causes a FIVE year depression. Credit collapses, banks fail, as do over ten thousand businesses (remember, the population of the US was a fraction of what it is, today, so that’s even worse than it sounds). This was caused, in part, by the attempt to “reign in” money supply, to synchronize it more tightly with gold. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1873 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_Depression _____________________________________________________________
- 1893
- 3 years (or else, it’s the final throw of the Long Depression started by gold in 1873)
- A shortage of gold creates a deflation of the US Dollar, causing the usual economic depression
- 500 banks fail
- 18% unemployment
- commodity prices collapse, including steel, grain, cotton, and timber
- 15,000 businesses fail
A return to a metal-based currency sets off another depression, the worst one until the Great Depression (which was, itself, actually a series of two depressions, the 1929 depression having gone into recovery in late 1932, and then failed under the idiotic minstrations of FDR). This depression starts with a contraction of credit, a run on banks (which is common when people expect money to be backed by metal) over 500 of which fail, the collapse of the stock market (this happened in 1869, too, forgot to mention that), then the failure of SIXTEEN THOUSAND businesses. It lasts four years…three times longer than a bad post-metal recession. But it’s also deeper and harder than the previous six year depression, making it our second worst.
http://blogs.ancestry.com/circle/?p=2824_____________________________________________________________
- 1901

Because of the worry that dollars leaving the country would create a domestic currency shortage, in the late 19th century countries often coined separate money for foreign trade, like this US Trade Dollar
- 1 year
- Declining money supply meets rising stock market
- Stock market collapse
The bimetal standard produces yet another price contraction, shattering the stock market (makes our current stock decline seem like a golden age). Bank failures, economic malaise that spread globally - the US is an economic superpower already, though people don’t realize it yet, and their foolishly metal-based business cycle hurts everyone. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1901 _____________________________________________________________
- 1907
- A shortage of money supply caused yet another disaster
- Bank failures, nationwide
- Stock failure, loss of over 50% of value
As money supply contracted, J.P. Morgan convinced various wealthy New York bankers to act as a private Federal Reserve, shoring up the banking system, and halting this economic failure…note that it worked better than any government-mandated monetary rescue before or since, including those by the Federal Reserve, FDIC, or the recent $700,000,000,000 bailout. Recognition of the dangers of an unmanaged metal currency, and the power of an influx of money to fight economic depression, resulted in an unfortunate swing to the other extreme as a “solution”: The founding of the Federal Reserve System.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1907 _____________________________________________________________
- 1920
- 2 years
- The Federal Reserve draws down money supply, exacerbating the economic failure caused by WWI and increasing socialist control of national economies worldwide
- Banks fail
- Stock market crashes
- Prices plummet
Government centralization of economies during WWI resulted in worldwide economic weakness, but with a new player: the Federal Reserve, founded in 1913, suddenly began tightening money supply. Because money was still based upon gold, this did not result in a modern recession in the US, but an actual economic depression. This economic failure was credited with the defeat of Woodrow Wilson’s successor, James Cox, in the 1920 election.
On the other hand, this depression was abnormally short, primarily because the Harding administration’s response was NOT more government intervention, “stimulus” programs, Keynesian economics, but simply to leave their hands off and let the correction happen.
- 1929

When money deflates, people choose to just hold onto it, starving the marketplace and causing a spiral of ever more deflation
- 11 years
- The Federal Reserve draws down money supply, right when banks are needing it to serve its function of providing liquidity, causing massive failures
- Banks fail
- Stock market crashes
- Depressionary spiral
The Great Depression was not, initially, all that great. It was deep, but was of a normal length, with two quarters of recovery by the end of 1932. Unfortunately, while FDR campaigned on balancing the budget, cutting government spending, regulation, and taxes, he actually expanded all of those things, enagaging in “stimulus” activity that caused the depression to drag on another eight years. One major factor in its eventual recovery was the ending of the gold standard in 1938.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panic_of_1819 http://www.thehistorybox.com/ny_city/panics/panics_article2a.htm
_____________________________________________________________
Recessions
In 1938, the US removed the dollar from the gold standard. Starting with its first recession in 1948, and going through 2007, the US — no longer strongly dependent upon the value of metal commodities for the value of its currency — did not suffer the severity of depressions, but instead tended to have relatively minor economic recessions when the Federal Reserve suddenly raised interest rates, causing a contraction of GDP growth.
- 1948
- 18 months
- Sharp inflation, except for:
- Decline in commodity prices
- Increased employment: 3.5% unemployment
The Federal Reserve suddenly cut interest rates, as the economic damage of WWII was being fully realized.
- 1953
- 12 months
- Moderate increase in unemployment
- GDP dropped by 6% in one quarter
- 6% unemployment
In 1952, the Federal Reserve contracted the money supply, which let to an economic recession, aggravated by the realization of the economic damage caused by the Korean War — Wars are always bad for economies, but this is usually not revealed until the war ends.
- 1957
- 8 months
- 7.5% unemployment
- 9% GDP decline
- Price inflation
The Federal Reserve again raised rates and cut money supply. Because of the economic dominance of the US, this recession spread across the whole globe. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Federal_Funds_Rate_(effective).svg
- 1960
- 10 months
- 6.9% unemployment
- 5.7% inflation
- Decline in goods production
Very minor downturn, on the heels of yet another sudden rate hike by the Fed. Largely confined to an increase in unemployment and inflation, like most recessions.
- 1969
- 11 months
- Moderate unemployment
- Decline in GNP
- Decline in goods production
- 1973
- 16 months
- 8.7% unemployment
- 12.2% inflation
- Dramatic decline in goods production and investment
- 11.2% interest rate
Economic upheaval caused by the end of the Breton Woods accord, the scandal and resignation of Richard Nixon, and the massive increase in oil prices caused by the OPEC embargo, produced one of the most significant recessions of the post-gold era, leading to prolonged stagflation.
- 1980
- 6 months
- 7.8% unemployment
- 12.2% inflation
- Significant investment decline
- 20% interest rate
After the end of the official recession in 1975, the economy never reached its normal economic growth, in part because of continued high oil prices, price controls unsuccessfully placed on oil that caused shortages of supply, massive increases in government regulation and spending, and price inflation caused by the high oil prices combining with the Federal Reserve’s expansion of money. By 1980, it was attempting to cut money supply again, and this era of “stagflation” climaxed in another, very short, official recession.
- 1981
- 16 months
- 10.8% unemployment
- 12.2% inflation
- Dramatic investment decline
- 21.5% interest rate
The dramatic economics changes of the Reagan administration (and the end of the Carter administration, who actually started the process, for example “deregulating” banking), albeit good in the long run, exacerbated the symptoms of stagflation in the short-term, especially a dramatic tightening by the Fed, leading to a rapid and dramatic economic downturn.
- 1991
- 8 months
- 6.1% unemployment
- 6.5% inflation
- 11.2% interest rate
Tax hikes, a spike in oil prices, significant interest rate hikes and Fed tightening, a general reversal of “Reaganomics” with the expansion of government under the Bush administration, the bailout of the Savings and Loan industry by the Federal government, preserving bad debt and inefficient businesses, the Gulf War, and other factors led to this significant, and persistent economic downturn, which was no longer officially a recession in 1992 or 1994, but was still a stagnant economy leading to two dramatic upset elections.
- 2001
- 16 months
- 8.7% unemployment
- 12.2% inflation
- Dramatic decline in goods production and investment
- 11.2% interest rate
- Prolonged stock market downturn
Ongoing Fed tightening had led to a dramatic stock market decline starting in 2000. The spike in oil prices, expansion of government, and direct economic disruption caused by the 9-11 attacks exacerbated this already-building downturn, producing a relatively short “recession”, that did not actually include two quarters of official shrinkage, followed by a prolonged period of relatively slow economic growth, in which, for example, the Stock Market never actually recovered to its previous levels (which, previously, it had almost always done within two years).
- 2007

We face, as was normal during the days of the gold standard, massive bank runs, a credit freeze, price failures
- ongoing
- 9.4% unemployment
- 1% deflation
- Bank failures
- Commodity price collapse
- Bank failures
While the economy never fully returned to normal economic growth, it staggered along for several years, but by 2007 the pressure of ever-increasing oil prices, years of increased government regulation, two voluntary wars, and enormous new “foreign aid” spending added up to a currency shortage that produced the first economic depression since 1938.
(this list is incomplete, but will continue to grow)
http://209.85.173.132/search?q=cache:Q8uet96fQYIJ:www.coba.panam.edu/ecofina/web_site/selectedworkingpapers/Recessionof60-61.pdf+”recession+of+1960″&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=us http://www.albany.edu/~renshaw/leading/ess13.html#tab13.2 http://www.bookrags.com/wiki/List_of_recessions
Climate Change Timeline | History of Economic Downturns | 8th Grade Final Exam




This is a wonderful beginning research tool. I wish that info was standardized (i.e., unemployment % with each year of depression/recession you discuss), but that is a quibble.
The oral history of my family is expressed here — great- great-grandparents and great-grandparents ruined in the many 19th century downturns, grandfather’s bitterness over ‘the bankers’.
I agree about standardizing the data, but I am trying not to create the illusion of standardization, when my sources are so different for each downturn.
All too often people reformat things to make them seem standardized, when in fact behind the scenes they are not.
I’m glad to know you’ve actually heard of the stuff from your family…most people seem to think there were no economic downturns before 1929.
[...] US Depressions [...]
Very nice site!
[...] History of Economic Downturns in the US [...]
Kaz,
Thanks for posting all this data. It’s very informative. My only complaint is that you mention the gold standard as the reason for all the bank runs, which is misleading. Bank runs happen because of our fractional-reserve system. When fear overcomes the majority of consumers, they run to the banks because they know there aren’t 100% reserves in the vault. If we had a 100% reserve requirement, and if private companies audited the banks’ reserves, people wouldn’t worry about their deposits, and there would be no bank runs.
The problem is our fractional-reserve system, not the gold standard.
I understand how many people new to the cause of liberty and Austrian economics confuse the issues of fractional reserve banks. But, quite simply, fractional reserve banking is a natural free market service. One would have to abandon the overall conclusions of Austrian economics to prevent FRB from dominating private finance.
“If we had a 100% reserve requirement”, for example, is an advocacy of socialism. It goes against all principles of liberty, and would destroy capitalism.
A fractional reserve bank provides an explicit, essential service to its customers, and the economy. You don’t save money by hording it; you save by investing it. And a fractional reserve bank, openly and honestly, not only invests your money for you, but even guarantees your return, and provides you with instantaneous liquidity.
You might as well blame the legality of private property for the failure of real estate prices, as blame the legality of fractional reserve banking for bank runs.
In fact, the shortage of currency produces inevitable failures in many industries that depend upon a stable money supply.
Note that there were NO bank runs, from 1938-2007.
Why? Because there was no money shortage. There were occasional money surpluses, which are also bad, and the fault of the government establishing a currency monopoly…but those are not nearly as bad as a money shortage.
But in 1938, the gold standard ended. From that point on, the only real problem was the Fed’s inherent inability to manage the currency (as no monopoly can manage supply and demand competently), but until 2004 (when, in fact, the fed was behaving as gold standard advocates would have them, by failing to expand money to keep the supply steady) it never under-supplied money the way the monopoly gold standard did.
Money shortages cause commodity price failures (as with real estate prices, and prices of many other commodities, now), credit tightness, and bank runs.
Thanks, Kaz. Do you have any recommended reading on private money?
I’m new to this. Have seen the phrase “Austrian economics” but haven’t studied the subject.
When I read the phrase “100% reserve requirement” I immediately wondered whether that would that the value of my money in the bank would rise (or not), i.e., would I earn interest? I am thinking I would not, but please discuss whether the 100% reserve requirement would work much the same as banking works under the fractional system, as well as why 100% reserve requirement is socialistic.
@Carolyn How does hogging up hundreds of billions of dollars of the credit market (as the government did to pay for the “stimulus bill”) expand the money supply?
@Kaz… so what do you think about the gold standard and what is your view of a healthy monetary policy?
A government-monopoly gold standard, the only type that would actually be implemented, would be even worse than what we have today, just as it was worse last time we had one.
The only healthy “monetary policy” is the same as the only healthy agricultural or internet service policy: Allow a free market of competitors offer various options, and see what evolves voluntarily.
Let banks issue currency based on commodities, or debt, or whatever. The reason fiat currency can’t work well is the same as why government farming and education always fail.
Bless you!!
very interesting. Eager to see how the upcoming expansion of the money supply will pull us out of this. Stimulus bill just passed.
February 13 (Friday), 2009.
The “stimulus” spending will not pull us out, any more than it did in 1930 or 1933. Remember that every penny the government spends is taken from the private economy, and competes with it. The private economy creates wealth, government does not, so this will simply stagnate the economy more.
[...] About|History of Economic Downturns in the US| [...]